The BibleTexts.com Bible Commentary Copyright 1996-2005 Robert Nguyen Cramer THE REVELATION OF JOHN |
.
|
Jump
to chapter ...
|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 |
Other resources |
This book is filled with groups of seven; in all, the number seven occurs fifty-four times. In the bible the number seven indicates totality, completeness; commentators point to the seven nations in Ezekiel 25-32 , representing all the Gentiles... The phrase the seven spirits who are before his throne (see also 3.1; 4.5; 5.6) is a way of speaking of the Holy Spirit...
G.B. Caird (Harper's New Testament Commentaries: The Revelation of St. John the Divine, New York: Harper & Row, 1966, pages 14-15) comments:
John uses the number seven as a symbol for completeness or wholeness... The seven spirits represent the Spirit of God in the fulness of his activity and power. Possibly John had in mind the sevenfold spirit with which the Messiah was to be endowed (Isa. xi. 2). But a more important source of his ideas is Zechariah iv, where the prophet describes a candelabra (Israel) with seven lamps ('the eyes of the Lord which range over the whole earth'); and the burden of his vision is, ' "Not by might or power, but by my Spirit," says the Lord of hosts.' We have here the first example of John's kaleidoscopic variations on Old Testament imagery; for in his vision the church is symbolized as an earthly reality by seven lampstands, and as a heavenly reality by seven stars in the right hand of Christ (i. 20) but it draws its life and power from the seven lamps or spirits before the throne (iv. 5), which are also said to be held by Christ (iii.1) and are identified with the seven eyes of the Lamb (v. 6). At all these points Zechariah was John's primary source. Be he may also have been aware of the part played by the seven planets in pagan mythology and politics. The use that John makes of the seven spirits, lamps, or stars was a direct challenge to the imperial myth of the divine ruler, and since defiance of emperor-worship was one of the main themes of his vision, it is reasonable to suppose that the challenge was intended.
J. Massyngberde Ford (The Anchor Bible: Revelation, New York: Doubleday, 1975, pages 376-377) comments,
seven. The number is chosen intentionally because it designates completeness, perfection, totality. In Judaism its sacredness was enhanced because the Sabbath was the seventh day, the sabbatical year was the seventh year and the seventh sabbatical was the Jubilee, the year of release. In the temple were seven altars, seven lamps, etc.; cf. I Enoch 21:3-6, 61:11.
the seven spirits. There has been much speculation about this phrase. There are, in the main, two different interpretations.
Many Greek writers and modern scholars think that the seven mighty throne angels of Jewish tradition are meant. These are mentioned in both the OT Apocrypha and the Pseudepigrapha, e.g. Tobit 2:15, and I Enoch 20:1-8 which even give their names: Uriel, Raphael, Raguel, Michael, Saraqael, Gabriel, and Remiel. Although the term "spirits" for angels is rare in both the OT and the NT (except I Kings 22:21-23 and Heb 1:7, 14), Justin, Apologia 1.6, mentions "good angels who follow and are made like to" the Son and come from the Father. Also, the seven spirits to be correlated with the seven churches (1:4) and it is implied that each church is under the tutelage of a guardian angel (1:20).
Second, in the early days of Christianity before the development of a Trinity theology angels might have been confused with the Holy Spirit. The Latin Church and many modern scholars regard the expression as referring to the Holy Spirit, called seven because of his seven gifts (cf. Isa 11:2-3 LXX; MT lists six gifts). This interpretation fits better with the seven spirits in the throne visions of Rev 4:5, 5:6 (collated with Zech 3:9, 4:10). Thus, Swete opts for diversity of ministries of the Spirit and quotes the old Latin commentators and Heb 2:4, 1Cor 12:10, 14:32, Rev 22:6.
There is a third possible interpretation. A fragment of the Qumran scrolls, 4QSerek concers the "Chief Princes" of the angelic hierarchy who offer seven words of blessing. There were apparently eight stanzas of which the first three and part of the eight are lost. These may be throne angels.
Other resources |
The morning star is probably the planet Venus, a symbol of victory and domination. Victorious Roman generals built temples in honor of Venus, and the sign of Venus was on the standards of Caesar's legions. In [Rev] 22.16 Christ himself is the morning star...
Other resources |
Other resources |
Other resources |
Other resources |
Other resources |
Other resources |
.
Other resources |
.
Other resources |
The Interpreter's Bible, Volume 12 (by Martin Rist, NY: Abingdon, 1957, pages 438-440) comments:
As the opening of the seventh seal was delayed by two scenes in ch. 7, so the blowing of the seventh trumpet must wait upon the scenes in 10:1-11:14. The tableau in ch. 10 is largely a rewriting of certain striking scenes in Ezek. 1-3. Accordingly, these O.T. passages will be briefly summarized.
Ezekiel relates that he saw the heavens opened, and a great cloud driven by a high wind came from the north flashing with light and glowing with an inner fire. As it drew near, the cloud was resolved into the throne of Yahweh [Jehovah, the Lord]. Yahweh himself was something like a man, but far more glorious. From the loins up he appeared like fiery amber, and from the loins downward like fire, with brightness all around him like a rainbow. After this marvelous theophany, God commissioned Ezekiel to prophesy against the rebellious children of Israel, and commanded him to eat a little scroll which he extended to him. The scroll, written on both sides, contained lamentations, mourning, and woe. Ezekiel did as he was told, and found the scroll sweet as honey in his mouth (Ezek. 2:8-3:3) . By eating it he became possessed of its prophecies, so that his book is actually a reproduction of the heavenly one. It was sweet as honey in his mouth because he found its prophecies of doom against the wicked most acceptable. John's earlier dependence upon this section of Ezekiel has been noted before.
10:1. With this before us, as it was before the author, let us turn to his portrayal. Since 4:1 he has been writing as though he were in heaven, but apparently his position has now shifted to earth, for he writes that he saw another mighty angel descending from heaven. This angel arrived in a cloud, as Yahweh did in Ezek. 1:4, but not as dramatically; and his appearance was reminiscent of that of Yahweh in Ezek. 1:27-28, for he had a rainbow on his head, his face shone like the sun, and his legs were like pillars of fire (cf. also Dan. 10:5-6; Apocalypse of Abraham 11) .
2a. Like Yahweh in Ezek. 2:9, he had a little scroll open in his hand, which contained a prophecy of doom (cf. 5:1 and Exeg., ad loc.) .
2b-3a. He set his right foot on the sea, and his left foot on the land, possibly to symbolize his mastery over all of the world, both sea and land. It was but to be expected that he should speak with a loud voice; but it is also said that he sounded like a lion roaring. The Messiah, according to II Esdras 11:37, roars like a lion; while in Amos 3:8 the voice of God himself was like that of a roaring lion, filling all people with fear and forecasting his divine punishment upon the sinful. This may be the significance of the lionlike voice of the angel.
3b-4. When he called out, the seven thunders sounded-which brings to mind that in the incident related in John 12:28-29, the voice of God sounded like thunder to some of the bystanders. However, a closer resemblance is to be found in Ps. 29:3-9, where the sevenfold voice of God, which seemed like thunder, had powerful effects on both sea and land. More than likely we are to consider that these seven thunders are the voice of God proclaiming the doom of the world. John was about to transcribe what the seven thunders had revealed, but for some reason he is ordered to seal up what he had heard and not to write it down. This is somewhat strange, for up to now John has been more than willing to relate what he has seen and heard. Possibly he considered the seven thunders as prophecies of doom which should not be revealed to mankind until later (as in Dan. 12:9) ; but they are not set forth later in this book.
Harper's New Testament Commentaries: The Revelation of St. John the Divine (by G.B. Caird, NY: Harper & Row, 1966, pages 125-126) comments:
Of all the angels who inhabit the pages of John's book only three are called mighty. The first mighty angel was the herald who proclaimed the challenge to all comers to try their strength at opening the scroll with seven seals, and who thus prepared the way for the advent of the Lamb (v. 2). Now, in what can only be a deliberate cross-reference, John speaks of another mighty angel, and we are encouraged to look for a new disclosure comparable in importance to the earlier one. The description of the angel gives us an inkling of what to expect. He is wrapped in the cloud of the divine presence, and over his head is the rainbow of the divine mercy (cf. iv. 3). He bears the delegated attributes of deity, but he is also the angel of Jesus Christ, whose face John has seen shining like the sun (cf. i. I6). The legs like pillars of fire are reminiscent of Israel's journeys in the wilderness. This is the angel who is to guide the new Israel through the darkness of its Exodus pilgrimage from Egypt to the promised land. The scroll he carries, then, will contain the gospel of God's mercy, but particularly as it affects the people of God in their earthly pilgrimage. The great scroll contained the purposes of God in so far as they were to be achieved by the Lamb. The little scroll contains a new version of those same purposes in so far as they are to be achieved through the agency of the church. The angel plants his feet on sea and land because his message, though directed in the first instance to the few, is of eventual significance to the whole world.
Other resources |
Harper's Bible Commentary [HBC] (edited by James Luther Mays, NY: Harper and Row, 1988)
11:1-14, Third Digression: The Two Prophetic Witnesses. This section narrates the mission of two mysterious eschatological prophetic witnesses... This entire section is not a vision that John sees but a meditation on the theme of the two witnesses. The pagan domination over the holy city will be for forty-two months (Rev. 11:2); the prophetic witness will be active for 1,260 days (v. 3). Both figures are derived from the time, two times, and half a time (i.e., three and one-half years) of Dan. 7:25, symbolizing a limited period of time.
The second oracle (Rev. 11:3-13) focuses on the ministry of the two prophetic witnesses abruptly concluded by the appearance of an eschatological adversary. The passage begins with an allusion to the two olive trees and the two (instead of seven) lamps of Zech. 4:1-14; the olive trees represent Zerubbabel the claimant to the Davidic throne and Joshua the high priest (Zechariah based his hopes for the restoration of Judah on them). The description of the witnesses draws from traditional Jewish conceptions of Enoch, Elijah, and Moses, all taken up alive into heaven like the two witnesses (v. 12)... They do not embody two specific eschatological figures (since they are identical in every respect) but represent the prophetic witness of the Christian church. The number two emphasizes the reliability of their testimony (Num. 35:30; Deut. 19:15; John 8:13-18)...
See also commentary on Dan 12:5-13 at http://www.bibletexts.com/verses/v-dan.htm#dan-12-5.
Other resources |
Other resources |
Other resources |
Other resources |
.
Other resources |
Other resources |
Other resources |
Other resources |
Other resources |
Other resources |
Note regarding the inaccuracy of the KJV text of Revelation: There are so many corrections needed in the KJV's text of Revelation, because the KJV's Greek text of Revelation (from Erasmus' Greek text, which later became known as the Textus Receptus) was of very unreliable quality. Not having all of the Greek text of Revelation, Erasmus translated some of Revelation from an aberant edition of the Latin Vulgate into Greek. So some of the KJV text of Revelation is based on the Latin Vulgate -- even an unreliable edition of it -- rather than on an ancient Greek text.
James R. White (The King James Only Controversy: Can You Trust the Modern Translations?, Minneapolis: Bethany House Publishers, 1995, p. 55) writes:
It is well known that Erasmus struggled with the text of Revelation. Not finding any manuscripts that contained the book, he borrowed one from his friend Reuchlin. Erasmus was quite please with the text, feeling that it was "of such great age that it might be thought to have been written in the time of the apostles." He had an unknown copyist make a fresh copy and returned the original to Reuchlin. The copyist had difficulty with the text (the manuscript contained a commentary on the book of Revelation, and the actual text of Scripture was imbedded in the commentary), and as a result made some mistakes that found their way into the printed editions of Erasmus' Greek text, and finally into the text of the King James Version.
Bruce M. Metzger (The Text of the New Testament: Its Transmission, Corruption, and Restoration, Third, Enlarged Edition, NY: Oxford University Press, 1992, pp. 99-100) writes:
For the Book of Revelation he [Erasmus] had but one manuscript, dating from the twelfth century, which he had borrowed from his friend Reuchlin. Unfortunately, this manuscript lacked the final leaf, which had contained the last six verses of the book. For these verses, as well as a few other passages throughout the book where the Greek text of the Apocalypse and the adjoining Greek commentary with which the manuscript was supplied are so mixed up as to be almost indistinguishable, Erasmus depended upon the Latin Vulgate, translating this text into Greek. As would be expected from such a procedure, here and there in Erasmus' self-made Greek text are readings which have never been found in any known Greek manuscript - but which are still perpetuated today in printings of the so-called Textus Receptus of the Greek New Testament...
For more details, browse http://www.bibletexts.com/kjv-tr.htm
Other resources |
God's curse, pronounced over the whole creation because of Adam's disobedience, is now abrograted (Gen. iii. 18; cf. Zech. xiv. 11), for the whole creation has been renewed by the re-creating hand of God; and no flaming sword bars the way to the tree of life.
No curse (22:3). At the beginning of things, humanity was perverted by its original rebellion against the Creator, wanting to be its own god (Gen. 3:1-6; Isa. 24:4-6; cf. Rom. 5:12-21). When sin entered the good creation, the world itself felt the blow, and a curse was pronounced on the very earth (Gen. 3:17), so that all historical human existence has been lived out in a fallen world (Gen. 3:17, cf. Rom. 8:18-25). John's vision of the new Jerusalem pictures a purified and redeemed humanity and a fallen world delivered from the bondage of evil by the God whose grace transforms pious individual souls as well as all of creation, "far as the curse is found."
22.19 apo tou xulou. Instead of apo tou xulou, the Textus Receptus (followed by the King James Version) reads apo biblou, a reading that occurs in no Greek manuscript. The error arose when Erasmus, in order to provide copy for the last six verses of Revelation (which were lacking in the only Greek manuscript of Revelation available to him), translated the verses from the Latin Vulgate into Greek. The corruption of "tree" into "book" had occurred earlier in the transmission of the Latin text when a scribe accidentally miscopied the correct word ligno ("tree") as libro ("book").
Abbreviations |
Copyright
1996-2004 Robert Nguyen Cramer
|
Bibliography |
editor@bibletexts.com |